How far were ideological factors responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture Essay

How far were ideologic agents trusty for Stalins purpose to put back the NEP with the collectivization of land and the pentad family Plans? I believe that ideological factor were responsible for Stalins close to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of floriculture and the Five class Plans as Stalin was disgruntled by the peasants work ethic and continuingly cute to become to a greater extent commie and ideological issues were the important contri just nowors that, if flipd would make a vast difference to Russia. However, other factors likewise could ca-ca been responsible for Stalins decisiveness to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five class Plans such as political and economical aspects. I feel that the main contributor in determining Stalins decision was the economic factors that Stalin was determined to industrialise Russia and under the NEP this was not possible.Ideological factors were responsible for Stalins decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans as the introduction of these new things meant that Russia could become more(prenominal) communist which was what Stalin eventually wanted. Before collectivisation was introduced, Stalin felt that peasant attitude lacked revolutionary spirit, instead than producing grain for the good of the community the peasants produced it for themselves and their own profit. This was viewed as capitalism and was against what Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Russia try to achieve and the NEP was helping the peasants develop capitalism. This is true in that of the introduction of collectivisation and the Five Year Plans and Stalin constantly wanted to become a more communist state. Through collectivisation Stalin promised significant increase in intersection which would allow the government to sell more overseas, providing more resources for industrialisation and a higher standard of living for urban workers. Collectivisat ion had a annihilative effect on the Russian peasantry, which resulted in Stalins change of evasive action in the Five Year Plans. beneath the NEP the peasants had prospered while conditions for the workers were slow to improve. Stalin wanted to reverse this. He intended to replace the bourgeois specialists with the red specialists who were improve by the Communist government and who came from the ranks of the working class. However, political factors could also be seen as responsible for Stalins decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans. Stalins desire to initiate collectivisation was doby his struggle against Bukharin and the Partys rightwing. The radical nature of collectivisation appealed to the Partys left wing. Moreover, it was far more appealing to some in the Communist Party than the right-wing alternative of importing grain. iota imports would mean reducing the pace of industrialisation because the money used to gre ase ones palms grain could not be spent on developing Russias industry and Stalin was incredibly eager to introduce industrialisation, it was one of his main aims for Russia.Under the NEP, importing grain many an(prenominal) have been inevitable as without collectivisation Russia would have had to get grain from abroad or they would have starved. This would have resulted in the slowing down of industrialisation which Stalin would not have been rejoiced about. Additionally, Stalins own arrest of agriculture (which was very little) also had some bearing on his decision. He had a different view and understanding of agriculture to that of Lenin so the changing of the NEP to collectivisation seemed a logical abuse for Stalin. Political factors were also responsible for Stalins decision to replace the NEP with the Five Year Plans. For many, these plans were seen as Stalins consolidation of power. His message was very clear- Lenins Russia, the Russia of the NEP was over, and Stalins Ru ssia was just beginning. By this he removed the NEP which Lenin had brought in, so that to project Russia it was no longer going to go by the words of Lenin, but of Stalin. Finally, economic factors also could have been seen to be responsible for Stalins decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans. The autumn of 1926 saw record grain harvests for the USSR. However, the harvests of 1927, 1928 and 1929 were poorer. The decrease in performance forced the impairment of agricultural products up.Consequently, the standard of living amongst urban workers declined. The NEP caused this decline in production and economically it was terrible for the country as without grain being produced the scrimping suffered huge losses and many Russian families were homeless. Collectivisation held out the purview of many economic benefits, those being that large farms would increase cogency, with improved efficiency it would mean that fewer people wer e needed to work on the farms, so releasing extra manpower for Russias developing industry and collectivisation promised a significant increase in production. Industrialisation was a main aim for Stalin and in his eyes throughcollectivisation Russia would become more industrial however under the NEP this was not possible. Similarly, the First Five Year Plan was introduced in response to the NEPs failure to industrialise Russia. eventide the NEPs supporters acknowledged that that policy could only industrialise Russia at a snails pace.The Five Year Plans aimed to speed up this process. It was evident that the NEP was not producing results quick enough and a new betterment was needed. In conclusion, I believe that economic reasons were the important factor responsible for Stalins decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans as the economy under the NEP was in tatters and if Stalin had not tried to change the approach quickly the Russi a economy would have been completely destroyed. Stalin wanted to increase the pace in which things were improving under the NEP results were often slow and unpredictable. Although I feel that political and ideological were important in Stalins decision I dont feel that they contributed to the extent that economical factors did. However, many points are linked, one in which that Stalin wanted Russia to become more communist and under the NEP that was not possible. This comes under all three factors and was an important factor in Stalins decision. By Lara Williamson12 MBE