Merit Philosophy Essay

In the present society we value struggle and wakeless work that we owe. The paper Merit Why do we value it? the informant, Louis Pojman, claims that in life we always get any(prenominal) we earn in life, what you deserve is what you get. just now other(a)s have come with the counter argument that we can non take value from our success beca manipulation of our social standing or our intelligence. I agree to Pojmans observation of things that Good deeds must be followed by advanced come to the forecomes and bad deeds by bad outcomes (pg. 96).And as well as Each roleplay in the world has an appropriate response. In this essay I will give details on the situations where this fits and also discuss the events in which sight feel hard done by when others atomic number 18 cosmos rewarded in situations where they should not. Merit is a quality which determines the distribution of rewards, praises and prizes on the soil of respectable or quality work done. Merits should be serv ed as the point basis of handing out rewards and punishments. Any person who trains or works really hard deserves a better position.For employment, at the office one intern works really hard and shapes his qualities better then any other interns, deserves to get the job over the bosss son, who spends less hours at the office and trains less, thinking that he has the job in the bag obviously because he is the bosss son. Pojman has stated in his study that I have trained harder then anyone else so I deserve to break through the wake. I deserve reward or praise for my kind minute as it came after an ethically good will thinking (pg. 87).The author explains in his paper that praising good deeds will countenance a person to do good deeds in the future. alternatively punishments ar handed out to revise the bad actions. With this we can also form a system in which we can search out the best possible order of people who can perform the toil efficiently. For example, I want the bes t engineers to build the particular bridge or I want the best performing employee to perform a working class for me. Being at the top of performing a task gives a person a deserving praise and reward according to the level.some(a) disagree to this and say that the person does not deserve to be rewarded for a job that has been done efficiently based on the drafting system. The lottery objection system says that One does not deserve his natural talents, his finding and his society in which he his living (pg. 99). It means that anyone having ability, want for example to run fast or to sing well, does not deserve it. So likewise they should not be awarded to sign contracts with different music companies or should not be awarded with prize money for winning a race on his talent.The natural lottery objection is flawed in my opinion. lot prefer to listen to the people who can sing well. The persons who cannot sing be being left out or not listened to fairly. The society chooses the p ersons for their stake of involvement. This goes for the persons having their natural ability to construct things smoothly with the most ideal results. cab atomic number 18t places a superior worth on the best of the best. It is natural to award the things this way. Every individual first learn and then develops his talents to serve the world.But there are also people who lack the determination to pass on good things. These people do not deserve merit for their non stark work attitude. An individual who train hard and have a good attitude deserves the best offered in life. Individuals who do well to others are also deserved to be treated well in return. Nothing like Mantle, whose name was on top of the transplant list just because he was a baseball player. He was admitted to the hospital because he had damaged his liver. He confessed that he has damaged his liver by the constant use of alcoholic drink and drugs.Because of his reputation he knocked off other who were in line a nd were throe from liver damage by no fault on their own. rice paddy Mantle did not deserve to get his new liver. As we are all human beings, when someone strips away someones talents they are believed to be equal. But in the case of Mickey Mantle it was not there and it spread injustice. He only deserved to get the liver but it was injustice to be placed top on the list. This limited occurrence is horrendous. It was an injustice to the humanity.I have stated in advance of Pojmans paper that high-quality work deserves merit and an equal reward or praise to the good work produced. Individuals get in life whatever they have put on it. It is very unfair to say that people with natural talents and abilities do not deserve good simply because they are born with it. One has to learn what he is good at and use his ability to do well. ? Reference Pojman, L. (1999). Merit Why Do We value It? Electronic version. Journal of Social Philosophy, 30(1), 83-102.