Impact of Aristotle on Education

Impact of Aristotle on genteelnessAristotle Education and PlatoThrough the life of Aristotle, virtuoso would wonder how a mere opinion of doctrine could impact the focussing of life preparation is practiced today as we issue it. Aristotles way of life reflected the way he model and what he wrote for population to view and educate upon today. He has many philosophies that argon brought proper(ip) into the classroom today without any sensation knowing they ar. His philosophies are truly remarkable. When a soul creates whateverthing or t all(prenominal)es something, the philosophies brought in the classroom fuck off so innate that mess who employ it dont even know it exists.Realism is an educational doctrine, which stresses intimacy that develops from wholenesss ensure senses. Under this philosophy the idea exists that t here is a sure gentleman non constructed by humanes dispositions, that can be known by unmatchables own mind. It is through experiencing the homo around everyone in which one hit the bookss the guiding principles and social conduct of life. Reality is what one experiences in the physical foundation. in that respectfore, everything one can square up and know comes from experiencing the world around us.Aristotle is con positionred by virtu altogethery to be one of the greatest pagan philosophers. He was born in a Grecian colony at Stagira, 384 B.C.E. At birth he was born into a set life. His father, Nicomachus, had a perplex under the fag Amyntas of Macedonia as judiciary physician. Therefore, this could relate to how his education started off. It was thought that his ancestors held the same position under the King because this way the area of court physician could become hereditary.As physician, Aristotle was taught in the area of medicines and was excessively trained for the position of court physician. It was here that he was clearly educated with a developing mind to entertain the many questions that arose in his head and the direction he would bear off to answer them. It is too clear that with each time Aristotle traveled from one place to another, it had some sort of impact on him his ideateing, his writings, and the way that philosophy is viewed today. With each place he traveled to, he was able to gain, share, teach, and experience the knowledge of philosophy.It was from when he was eighteen till he was about 37 that he canvas under the guidance of Plato as his pupil in Athens. He was held as a distinguished student among the group that studied with him in the Grove of Academus. The only if problem that probemed to arise in his historic period of study was his relation with his teacher. Now these instances are not clear exactly it is known that both Aristotle and Plato had each their own ideas about certain views and philosophies.Therefore, it is only record for them to bump heads a little in arguments over whether any side was conscionableifiable with their ideas, belie fs, and/or views. There was still no earth to believe that the two did not save any form a friendship, since they both had such(prenominal) high views toward life. Legend reflected poorly and unfavorably upon Aristotle provided legend has not been viewed that way as it is today. But it was shown even after Platos death in 347 B.C.E. that Aristotle still held Plato in high respects. He never gave any lack of cordial appreciation to him, when all people evaluate him to do once he died. The death of soulfulness important in his life probably withal affected the way he thought about certain ideas.After his teachers death, Aristotle went to Atarneus in Asia Minor where he met with the ruler, Hermias. There he would be married to Hermias adopted daughter Pythias. This may not seem relevant to how it influenced objectiveism in education, only if one were to think about it, how can marriage not change the way someone thinks in some sort of way? A few historic period passed, Hermias was murdered due to rebellion and King Philip II of Macedon called upon Aristotle to return to Stagira. It was here that he would become the tutor of black lovage the Great, who was only thirteen days old. This had a great impact on score, as people know it. Aristotle taught him the knowledge of ethics and politics, as rise as many secrets of philosophy in which many people probably would kick in trouble comprehending. black lovage the Great profited from the knowledge passed on from Aristotle along with Aristotle influencing the mind of the young prince to his benefit, and that is how history was affected by this contact between these two people. Once Alexander took the throne, Aristotle returned to Athens and there opened a school of philosophy. Later he followed in the footsteps of his teacher, Plato. He formed a school, Lyceum, in a gymnasium, where he gave regular instruction in philosophy. It was here that for thirteen years (335-322B.C.E.) as a teacher at the Lyceum, h e came up with the greater descend of his writings. He came up with dialogues, which were writings that Aristotle frequently wrote that are still take on today and were then by his pupils. When teach at the Lyceum, Aristotle had a utilisation of walking about as he taught.It was in connection with this that his following became known in later years as the peripatetics, slosheding, to walk about. Besides, he composed the several treatises on physics, metaphysics, and so forth, in which the exposition is a language more technical than in the dialogues. These writings show how a lot of a great influence they have, such as the way they impacted Alexander whom later became known as Alexander the Great. They show in percentageicular how he succeeded in bringing together the works of his predecessors in Greek philosophy, and how he spared n either suffers nor expense in pursuing, either personally or through others, his investigations in the realm of natural Phenomena.When black lovage death became known at Athens, and the outbreak occurred which led to the Lamian war Aristotle was cause to share in the general unpopularity of the Macedonians. The charge of impiety, which had been brought against Anaxagoras and Socrates, was now, with even less reason, brought against him. He left the city, saying (according to many ancient authorities) that he would not break out the Athenians a chance to sin a third time against Philosophy. He took up his residence at his country house, at Chalcis, in Euboea, and there he died the following year, 322B.C.E. His death was due to a disease from which he had long suffered. The story that his death was due to hemlock poisoning, as well as the legend, saying they he threw himself into the sea are absolutely without historic foundation.There are numerous ways that the theories, philosophies, ethics, writings, and styles of pedagogy of Aristotle have influenced education today and more or less comparablely will continue to in the future. Aristotle believed potently in the importance of an education that studies the real world and then draws conclusions and gains knowledge through analytical exercises. With practically everything that is done today and taught today, there is some relevant relation to that of Aristotle and his beliefs.Through some of Aristotles books of Politics, one is able to see how education could be influenced and affected by what Aristotle says in his writings. Aristotles ethical guess is expressed through many feels. Aristotle tends to express his feeling towards impartiality in a way where it can go two ways. He negotiation of how uprightness is divided into moral and intellectual virtue. Excellence of character deals with the middlingish life and happiness. People are concerned with their character and getting the well-fixed mean, which is true happiness, in life. One whom educates would be affected by this prospering mean because they must learn to stray away from th is aspect. They have to learn to educate for the sole purpose of those who are being taught to thrive as to what they are being taught.In a way, all these are co-ordinated with each other. Aristotle also explains the relation between ethics and politics, which leads to the implication for nature of morality and well living. Virtue, to Aristotle, is interpreted as the duty of an disapprove and that the object will perform its sour effectively. This goes for people as well. For example a virtuous pedagogue will successfully teach their students information they contain to comprehend in order to go forward with their education. Aristotle divides human virtue into two types. One is moral virtue and the other is intellectual virtue. Although, it is embarrassing to give an exact definition of each type, one would hope that an educator of today would lean toward the more moral virtuous side. Virtue is also a nation of character that is concerned with choice with the fortunate mea n. This leads to debateing the mean according to Aristotle. People who are morally virtuous are forever making their decisions according to the golden mean. Of course not everyone is the same, different people have different means.This brings about the organize that the in force(p) life is a life of happiness. Aristotle says such a life can be discoverd by excellence in the two areas of virtue, moreover people are all aiming at some type of good in life. Some just may have higher expectations in their goal. People with virtual excellence want to have the good life that, according to them, is the excellence of character. The good life is referred to as being happy with life. Happiness must have two concepts included to fit Aristotles definition. Someone must exercise his or her thought of reason. He calls this activity of soul. Happiness also must have quality in the performance of the virtue, and it is the read/write head goal that everyone wishes to accomplish. Aristotle arg ued that the goal of human beings is happiness, and that we discover happiness when we fulfill our function, or purpose of life. Therefore, it is necessary to contain what our function is.The function of a thing is what it can alone do, or what it can do best. This here is a key point in which an educator must understand. This key point of understanding is one of the most influential things Aristotle elaborates upon in my opinion. When he implies that the function is what one can do best, he implies that if someone is best at teaching, than they are to teach as their purpose in life. As a result of this function, they would than achieve happiness, but only if they were to do it in a virtuous way would they achieve happiness. Happiness is something that must be aligned with perfect virtue. This also goes along with the excellence of character. If someone is to have excellence of character he or she want or try to be happy and have the good life. If they achieve this then they will have the excellence of character. Some of these aspects are interrelate with each other. For instance, happiness is an activity of the soul that is along side of perfect virtue. Aristotle also says that virtue must be a state of character because of a persons proclivity to act in a way that would ensure that golden mean.Virtue, excellence, the mean, the good life, happiness, and character are all interrelated within each other to be happy with life and achieve the golden mean. With all of this intertwined, the influence placed upon education, as a whole, is how an educator actually teaches. One may not realize it, but just think about what Aristotle shows through his views. Dont people go to school to learn morals, virtues, build character, find what they wish to do with their life, what they find to be enjoyable in life, etc. Every single thing an educator does to a student, as a whole, is based upon Aristotle ethics and politics with happiness.Another aspect in which Aristotle influenced education today is his views on realism. According to a realists point of view, the purpose of education would be to learn behavior in our decree and guidelines to live our lives by. Throughout its long varied history, realism has had a frequent theme, which is called the principle or thesis of independence. This theme holds that reality, knowledge, and value exists independently of the human mind. This means that realism rejects the idealist view that only ideas are real. intimacy exists even though there is no mind to perceive them, such as the classic question about the tree falling in the woods. To the realist, matter is certainly an independent reality, however, the realist also considers ideas to be part of the thesis.The federal agency of the educator would be more of a guide or consultant to the students kind of than an actual teacher. The whole idea of a realist is to learn by experience, so the students need a guide than a teacher so they can encounter it for themselves. Doing this, the students can determine what kind of knowledge they are inquiring, and how they can apply it to their lives. Therefore, an educators responsibility would be to teach students to learn from the world around them, not just out of books and from history. While performing this role, the educator needs to present the subject in a exceedingly create and precise manner.While the educators are explaining how to learn from the real world, they might use many different kinds of methods from outside the classroom, such as champaign trips. This would permit the students practice this knowledge themselves without have an adult stand up in front of a class and lecture about it. A realist would also present their material in a systematic and organized way and would also teach that these are clearly defined criteria for making judgments in art, economics, politics, etc. The children need to learn through trial and error, and experiencing joy and pain from naturally occurring experiences in their lives.Realists also like to examine physical characteristics of an object. They like to know the base of the subject and debate over its physical characteristics, rather than debate whether it exists or not. Many realists do like structure in their view of education. A realist educator needs to use lectures, demonstrations, sensory experiences, and teaching machines during their class. They usually approve of competencies, performance based teaching, and accountability. With this idea of using field experience instead of classroom lectures brings many controversial issues.A flunk in realism is that the curriculum for the class must be one that is rich in ideas for the conceptions to be tested. An educator must also be able to classify and categorize characteristics with similarities and differences. Others also say that the curriculum has to be organized in separate subjects in order to create an cost-efficient and effective way of learning about ou r real world. Realism also fails to deal with social change quite frequently, being that no one knows what will be tomorrow, so therefore it is more of a teaching based upon the present and past.Being more in the outside world than in the classroom would make a student more universally aware, and maybe have more common sense, but not as truer book smarts. This question raises another idea of which student would be more effective, one who spends all their time in the classroom, or one who is running(a) out in the work field? Should we even be departure to school, or should we all just study all that is around us to be more educated. This is a question, which may never be answered, but according to a realist, the answer lies in the real world. For in the real world you can learn anything, more than you ever could in a classroom.In discussing Aristotles ethical theory, I found that he saw virtue as the excellence of an object and that the object will perform its function effectively. He also talked of the two types that people are classified into. morally virtuous people base their life on finding the golden mean. Aristotle argues how the good life is a life of happiness and that everyone is aiming for that. Happiness, explained by Aristotle, is the chief good desirable to everyone. Excellence of character is achieved when someone has taken part in the good life and is truly happy. It was shown how all of these aspects are interrelated with each other in the sense that they all need each other to discuss a theory. Also, his realist point of view ties in to what the real world experience has to offer. Yes, ethics should be taught in class, but the outside world can not be ignored. Realism is a organic aspect to teaching and to a students life whether able to be observe or not. Aristotle talked of many things that people have and will continue to discuss for years to come.Work CitedAristotle (384-322 BCE) General Introduction. 2006. The Internet Encyclopedia o f Philosophy. May initiatory 2007 .Aristotle 384 BC 322 BC. February 1999. JOC/EFR. May 1st 2007 Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E.). 1994-2007. Regents of the University of California. May 1st 2007 Ross, David. Aristotle. New York Routledge, 1996.Lear, Johnathan. Aristotle the desire to understand. The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambrige, United Kingdom The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.